翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ R v Sparrow ・ R v Spencer ・ R v Starr ・ R v Steane ・ R v Stephens ・ R v Stevens ・ R v Steyn ・ R v Stillman ・ R v Stinchcombe ・ R v Stone ・ R v Storrey ・ R v Strachan ・ R v Suberu ・ R v Sullivan ・ R v Sullivan (Canada) ・ R v Sussex Justices, ex p McCarthy ・ R v Swain ・ R v Symonds ・ R v Tang ・ R v Terry ・ R v Tessling ・ R v Therens ・ R v Thomas ・ R v Thomas Equipment Ltd ・ R v Tse ・ R v Turcotte ・ R v Turpin ・ R v Tutton ・ R v U (FJ) ・ R v Vaillancourt Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク R v Sussex Justices, ex p McCarthy ： ウィキペディア英語版 R v Sussex Justices, ex p McCarthy ''R v Sussex Justices, Ex parte McCarthy'' (() 1 KB 256, () All ER Rep 233) is a leading English case on the impartiality and recusal of judges. It is famous for its precedence in establishing the principle that the mere appearance of bias is sufficient to overturn a judicial decision. It also brought into common parlance the oft-quoted aphorism ''"Not only must Justice be done; it must also be seen to be done."'' ==Facts== In 1923 McCarthy, a motorcyclist, was involved in a road accident which resulted in his prosecution before a magistrates court for dangerous driving. Unknown to the defendant and his solicitor, the clerk to the justices was a member of the firm of solicitors acting in a civil claim against the defendant arising out of the accident that had given rise to the prosecution. The clerk retired with the justices, who returned to convict the defendant. On learning of the clerk's provenance, the defendant applied to have the conviction quashed. The justices swore affidavits stating that they had reached their decision to convict the defendant without consulting their clerk. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「R v Sussex Justices, ex p McCarthy」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.